top of page

F. O. Ajibowo and Co. Ltd v. Western Textiles Mills Ltd (1976)


Source: Aninka Bongers-Sutherland/Getty Images
Source: Aninka Bongers-Sutherland/Getty Images

The intersection of intellectual property law and fashion design has long been a subject of legal scrutiny. One of the landmark Nigerian cases that shaped the discourse on confidentiality and ownership in textile design is F. O. Ajibowo and Co. Ltd v. Western Textiles Mills Ltd (1976). The Nigerian Supreme Court's decision in this case underscores the legal principles governing industrial design protection, particularly in cases where confidential disclosures are involved. The ruling remains relevant for contemporary fashion brands seeking to safeguard their proprietary designs in an industry where imitation is prevalent.



Background of the Case


The dispute in Ajibowo v. Western Textiles centered on whether the appellant’s textile design had been publicly disclosed before its legal protection was secured. The appellant, F. O. Ajibowo and Co. Ltd, claimed ownership of a textile pattern and argued that its design was improperly used by Western Textiles Mills Ltd. The respondent countered that the design had already been published and was, therefore, not entitled to protection.


At the core of the case was the question of whether the communication of a design to a manufacturing partner amounted to public disclosure. The appellant contended that the disclosure was made under circumstances that implied confidentiality, while the respondent asserted that no such confidentiality agreement existed.


The Supreme Court, in its ruling, held that the disclosure of the textile design to the respondent did not constitute a prior publication. The judgment emphasised that when a design is shared with a party that has a vested interest in its production and distribution, such communication does not strip the design of its legal protection. The decision reaffirmed the principle that proprietary rights in industrial designs can be preserved even in commercial transactions, provided that confidentiality is maintained.



Lessons for Fashion Brands


The ruling in Ajibowo v. Western Textiles offers valuable lessons for contemporary fashion brands operating in an industry where protecting unique designs is crucial to maintaining competitive advantage.


  1. The Importance of Confidentiality Agreements

One of the key takeaways from this case is the necessity of legally binding confidentiality agreements when disclosing designs to manufacturers, suppliers, or business partners. Fashion brands must ensure that any collaboration involving proprietary designs is governed by explicit non-disclosure provisions to prevent unauthorised use or reproduction.



  1. The Legal Standard for Public Disclosure

The case sets an important precedent by distinguishing between public disclosure and confidential transactions. Fashion designers should be aware that sharing a design in a controlled and confidential setting does not necessarily constitute publication that would invalidate their intellectual property rights. Understanding this distinction is critical when working with third parties in production and distribution.



  1. The Burden of Proof in Intellectual Property Disputes

For fashion brands seeking to enforce their intellectual property rights, Ajibowo v. Western Textiles underscores the necessity of maintaining clear documentation of agreements and transactions. In legal disputes over design ownership, the burden often falls on the claimant to demonstrate that the disclosure occurred under conditions of confidentiality.


Conclusively, the Ajibowo decision remains a foundational case in the legal landscape of industrial design protection. It reaffirms the principle that confidential disclosures, when made within the framework of a business transaction, do not constitute prior publication. For fashion brands, this ruling provides a crucial reminder to proactively safeguard their creative assets through well-structured legal agreements. In an industry driven by innovation and originality, legal awareness is as essential as creative ingenuity in ensuring long-term success.

Comments


bottom of page